So, Dasan Books re-established the direction of the digital content business with "story content." We focused on publishing webnovels that had a strong genre, such as romance and fantasy. At the same time, we continued to make attempts to expand the webnovels’ category. We tried to "webnovel-ize" detective, mystery, and thriller fiction by collaborating with Kakaopage and CJ E&M through "Mobile Novel Contest" and "Chumith (combination of ‘churi’ meaning detective, ‘mi’ from mystery, and ‘th’ from thriller)," respectively. Dasan Books published a number of titles, but I particularly remember the webnovel The Story of Yeonhwa the best. We also did PR for this title at the Asia Content & Film Market held at the Busan International Film Festival (BIFF).
KRAFTON

Its innate spirit of cultural or ideological inclusivity will remain pivotal for the cultural progress of Korea. Whether it be writing, designing, printing, distributing or marketing, having your say or directional preference be implemented — or even taken into consideration — is itself a huge merit. Though tackling the entire process can be arduous, there certainly is inherent joy specific to the act 토렌트야동 of designing every aspect of a book on your own.
Diversifying Channelsof Expression

RG’s Follow feature supports the finding of collaborators by enabling members to keep up to date with what their peers are working on. Providing ongoing notifications to scholars, regarding the research activities of the peers they follow, makes it possible to identify, locate and directly approach potential collaborators among them. RG also tells a member which users 토렌트야동 are looking at their papers, provided that the user permits it, which serves as another means for unearthing prospective collaborators.
Registration and Activities of Student Self-governing activities
It is hardly surprising then to find that a user wonders in a question posed in December, 2014 (ResearchGate, 2014c) "Where are ResearchGate groups? " Incidentally, his question remains unanswered, but more than a year later, two other users express interest in adding a group functionality, too, seemingly unaware of the existence of Topics, or their RG-intended purpose. This is mainly because Topics are not the scholar-created and scholar-moderated forums that one would expect such a group to be, which, indeed, originally was the intention. RG enables the uploading to one’s profile and the sharing of datasets, inclusive of raw datasets and data from failed experiments, which can be attached as a file to a publication or a private message. In 2015 RG announced the launch of the alpha-version of the Trending Publications (ResearchGate, 2015d) page, intended to provide information on the most viewed and downloaded research on RG over a 24hour period in various, widely-defined disciplines. Interestingly, a spot check indicates that the articles accessed this way are not necessarily new ones.
1 The Scholarship of Research
RG’s efforts to support the formal dissemination of research output are still a work in progress, although, as Ward et al. (2015) point out, it already promotes Open Science, providing as it does fast, free, and open access to research results. It is its open peer review system that may be considered inadequate for recruitment, tenure and promotion purposes, mainly because of the reluctance on the part of researchers and institutions to drop traditional peer review. However, open peer review is not without its shortcomings, either, as its refereeing process is in fact a general, open debate about the manuscript, conducted among self-appointed referees, whose identity is known to all (for a thorough review of the literature discussing open peer review see Ford, 2013). Most notably, the transparency it affords can be seen as potentially harming to the carefully built connections among researchers, in result of which, as Ford (2013) explains, "there is widespread scepticism about open peer review, and many potential authors and referees hesitate to participate.
True, as Ijad Madisch, co-founder and CEO of ResearchGate points out in a recent interview, this safeguards RG from abuse, at least to an extent (Winter, 2015). Indeed, unless the prospective practitioner or community-representative collaborators are also independent or amateur researchers, with a verifiable publication record, they are unlikely to be RG members. An important finding that emerges from this review of RG’s functions is that the users are often left in the dark as to site developments. There is a public forum to discuss RG and provide feedback to staff, but it is ‘pending review’, as it has been for years, and cannot be followed. This state of affairs needs to be addressed for RG to successfully fulfil its mission of providing researchers what they need to advance their research.

Once you’ve set eyes on her little Lina is an ebony OnlyFans model which you can’t forget. With contours in each of the appropriate places, and a lot of boob and booty photographs, this content inventors going to travel you wilderness as soon as you have a look at her adult content material. Some OnlyFans aficionados are content to get what others give them, but others are looking for something a bit more personal.
First Look – Very best OnlyFans Accounts to follow along with