Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// means you've safely connected to the.gov site. Share delicate info just on official, secure websites.
- About - The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report an Infraction
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney General ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Rights Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct providers of housing, such as proprietors and genuine estate business along with other entities, such as towns, banks or other loan provider and house owners insurer whose discriminatory practices make housing unavailable to persons because of:
race or color.
religious beliefs.
sex.
national origin.
familial status, or.
special needs.
In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department may submit suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of individuals raises an issue of public importance. Where force or danger of force is utilized to reject or interfere with reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice may set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act likewise offers treatments for handling individual complaints of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have actually been victims of an unlawful housing practice, might file a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own lawsuit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings matches on behalf of individuals based upon recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
Among the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to prohibit race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing service providers attempt to disguise their discrimination by giving false info about availability of housing, either saying that nothing was available or guiding homeseekers to specific areas based upon race. Individuals who receive such false info or misdirection may have no understanding that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous cases alleging this kind of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to reveal this sort of surprise discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. The majority of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have alleged discrimination based upon race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually also alleged that municipalities and other local government entities broke the Fair Housing Act when they denied licenses or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to primarily minority communities, because the potential citizens were expected to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination in housing based upon religious beliefs. This prohibition covers circumstances of overt discrimination against members of a specific religion as well less direct actions, such as zoning regulations designed to limit making use of personal homes as a places of praise. The variety of cases filed because 1968 declaring religious discrimination is little in contrast to a few of the other forbidden bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does consist of a restricted exception that allows non-commercial housing run by a spiritual organization to reserve such housing to individuals of the very same religious beliefs.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Recently, the Department's focus in this location has been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, particularly those who are poor, and with minimal housing alternatives, often have little option but to tolerate the embarrassment and degradation of unwanted sexual advances or threat having their households and themselves got rid of from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on landlords who create an illogical living environment by demanding sexual favors from tenants or by developing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we seek both to acquire relief for renters who have been dealt with unjustly by a property owner since of sex and also discourage other prospective abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with effects. In addition, pricing discrimination in mortgage loaning might likewise adversely affect females, especially minority ladies. This type of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of an individual's birth or where his or her forefathers come from. Census data indicate that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing section of our country's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action versus community governments that have actually tried to decrease or restrict the number of Hispanic families that may reside in their neighborhoods. We have taken legal action against loan providers under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually enforced more stringent underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has actually likewise taken legal action against loan providers for discrimination against Native Americans. Other areas of the country have actually experienced an increasing variety of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This includes new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have actually acted against personal proprietors who have actually discriminated against such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing against families with children under 18. In addition to forbiding a straight-out denial of housing to families with children, the Act likewise avoids housing service providers from enforcing any special requirements or conditions on tenants with custody of children. For example, property managers may not find families with children in any single part of a complex, put an unreasonable limitation on the overall number of persons who may live in a home, or restrict their access to recreational services offered to other tenants. In many circumstances, the modified Fair Housing Act restricts a housing provider from refusing to rent or sell to families with children. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which meets the requirements stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might operate as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually published regulations and extra guidance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination on the basis of disability in all types of housing transactions. The Act defines persons with a disability to indicate those individuals with psychological or physical problems that considerably restrict one or more significant life activities. The term psychological or physical problems might include conditions such as blindness, hearing disability, mobility disability, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, persistent fatigue, learning disability, head injury, and mental disorder. The term significant life activity may consist of seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual jobs, looking after one's self, finding out, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise protects persons who have a record of such an impairment, or are considered as having such an impairment. Current users of prohibited controlled substances, individuals founded guilty for prohibited manufacture or distribution of an illegal drug, sex culprits, and juvenile culprits are ruled out disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act affords no defenses to people with or without specials needs who provide a direct risk to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody positions such a direct risk should be made on an individualized basis, however, and can not be based on general presumptions or speculation about the nature of a special needs. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's protections for persons with specials needs has actually concentrated on 2 significant locations. One is insuring that zoning and other regulations worrying land use are not utilized to prevent the domestic options of these individuals, including needlessly limiting communal, or congregate, property arrangements, such as group homes. The second area is guaranteeing that freshly built multifamily housing is built in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's availability requirements so that it is available to and functional by people with disabilities, and, in specific, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that prohibit discrimination versus people with impairments, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is implemented by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some people with specials needs may cohabit in congregate living plans, often described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits municipalities and other regional federal government entities from making zoning or land use decisions or executing land use policies that leave out or otherwise victimize people with impairments. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To utilize land use policies or actions that treat groups of individuals with specials needs less favorably than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be a regulation prohibiting housing for individuals with disabilities or a particular type of impairment, such as psychological disease, from finding in a specific location, while allowing other groups of unrelated individuals to cohabit in that area.
- To take action against, or reject an authorization, for a home because of the disability of people who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a building license for a home due to the fact that it was intended to provide housing for persons with psychological retardation.
- To decline to make sensible accommodations in land usage and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings might be necessary to manage individuals or groups of individuals with specials needs a level playing field to use and take pleasure in housing. What constitutes a reasonable lodging is a case-by-case determination. Not all requested adjustments of rules or policies are reasonable. If an asked for adjustment imposes an unnecessary financial or administrative burden on a city government, or if an adjustment creates a fundamental alteration in a city government's land usage and zoning scheme, it is not a "sensible" lodging.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing against individuals with impairments to consist of a failure "to develop and build" particular new multi-family residences so that they are available to and functional by persons with disabilities, and especially people who use wheelchairs. The Act requires all newly built multi-family residences of four or more systems planned for very first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have certain features: an accessible entryway on an available path, available typical and public usage areas, doors adequately wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each home, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in accessible location, reinforcements in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and functional cooking areas and restrooms set up so that a wheelchair can navigate about the space.
Developers, builders, owners, and designers accountable for the style or building and construction of new multi-family housing may be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to fulfill these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous enforcement actions versus those who stopped working to do so. Most of the cases have been fixed by authorization decrees providing a variety of kinds of relief, consisting of: retrofitting to bring inaccessible features into compliance where practical and where it is not-- alternatives (financial funds or other building requirements) that will supply for making other housing units accessible; training on the accessibility requirements for those associated with the building procedure; a required that all brand-new housing jobs adhere to the ease of access requirements, and financial relief for those hurt by the violations. In addition, the Department has looked for to promote availability through building codes.
