Baby boomers had it much easier than the younger generations purchasing a home - despite needing to pay exorbitantly high rate of interest.

The generation born after the war were struck with enormous 18 per cent rate of interest back in the late 1980s.

Those repayments were crippling, when they were coming of age in the seventies and eighties, but homes were significantly cheaper compared with common incomes.

That was likewise back when Australia's population was nearly half of what it is today, long before yearly migration levels soared.

Baby boomer economist Saul Eslake bought his first house in Melbourne's St Kilda East for $105,000 in 1984 on a $35,000 income when he was 26, after taking advantage of complimentary university education.

With an $80,000 mortgage, he was obtaining bit more than double his pay before tax and hits out at any recommendation his boomer generation did it harder - in spite of the high rates of interest he paid.

'I paid eighteen-and-a-half percent for a few of that however my very first home expense $105,000 and it took me less than 3 years to save up the deposit,' he told Daily Mail Australia.

'Despite the fact that rates of interest are less than half what I was paying, it was no place near as tough as now and I didn't have HECS debt to pay off since I was part of that fortunate generation when it was free.

The generation born after the war were hit with massive 18 per cent rates of interest back in the late 1980s (pictured is Terrigal on the NSW Central Coast)

'My generation had it quite simple - we secured free education, we got housing extremely inexpensively and we have actually made a motza out of the boost in home rates that we have actually chosen.'

In 1980, Sydney's mid-point priced house cost $65,000, or simply 4.5 times the average, full-time male wage in an age when a lady would struggle to get a mortgage without a signature from her husband.

Property data group PropTrack approximated Sydney's mean house would cost $338,000 today, or just 4.3 times the average salary now for all Australian employees, if house costs had actually increased at the very same pace as incomes throughout the past 45 years.

In 2025, Sydney's middle-priced house costs $1.47 million or 14.3 times the average, full-time wage of $103,000.

But that price-to-income ratio surges to 18.7 if it's based upon the typical income of $78,567 for all workers.

AMP deputy chief financial expert Diana Mousina, a Millennial, said the more youthful generations were having a tougher time now saving up for 20 percent mortgage deposit just to purchase a home.

'The issue now is simply getting into the marketplace - that's what takes the bigger piece of attempting to save; it takes 11 years to conserve,' she said.

Realty data group PropTrack estimated Sydney's mean house would cost $338,000 today, or just 4.3 times the typical wage now for all Australian workers, if house costs had actually increased at the exact same pace as earnings throughout the previous 45 years

Boomers fought with sky high rate of interest in the 80s - they haven't been that high considering that - but they had it much easier due to the fact that house costs were a lot more inexpensive

BREAKING NEWS

The problem Anthony Albanese DOESN'T want to discuss on the economy as migration skyrockets

Melbourne's mid-point house price expense just $40,000 in 1980 or 2.8 times the average male wage.

If cost had remained constant, a normal Melbourne would now cost simply $205,400.

But the Victorian capital's typical home price of $850,000 is now 10.8 times the average wage for all workers.

Brisbane's median house rate expense $32,750 in 1980 or simply 2.2 times what a typical man earned.

That would be $174,600 today if purchasing power hadn't altered.

Queensland capital houses now cost $910,000 or 11.6 times the average salary.

The significant banks are not likely to provide someone more than five times their pay before tax, which means numerous couples would now have a hard time to get a loan for a capital city home unless they relocated to a far, external suburb and had a big deposit.

Housing affordability degraded following the intro of the 50 percent capital gains tax discount in 1999, prior to annual migration levels tripled during the 2000s.

'Since about 2000, you've seen home rates relative to incomes increase at a substantial amount - it's been the truth that we have been running high levels of population development - so immigration, so more demand for housing,' Ms Mousina said.

Baby boomer economist Saul Eslake bought his first house in Melbourne's East Kilda for $105,000 in 1984 on a $35,000 wage when he was 26, after gaining from complimentary university education

'We have actually been running high migration targets, at the same time we haven't been constructing adequate homes across the country.

'We do have pretty beneficial financial investment concessions for housing, including unfavorable gearing, capital gains tax concession.'

Mr Eslake said politicians from both sides of politics wanted house prices to rise, due to the fact that more voters were homeowner than tenants attempting to get into the marketplace.

'For all the crocodile tears the political leaders shed about the problems dealing with would-be first home purchasers, they understand that in any given year, there's only 110,000 of them,' he said.

'Even if you presume that for everyone who succeeds, in ending up being a first home purchaser, there are five or six who want to but can't - that's at many around 750,000 votes for policies that would restrain the rate at which house costs go up.

'Whereas the politicians know that at any time, there are at least 11million Australians who own their own home; there are 2.5 million Australians who own at least one financial investment residential or commercial property.

'Even the dumbest of our politicians - as the Americans state, "Do that math" which is why at every election, political leaders on both sides of the divide - while bewailing the difficulties dealt with by first-home purchasers - pledge and execute policies that make it worse since they know that a vast majority of the Australian population do not want the problem to be fixed.'

Sydney was the very first market to become seriously unaffordable as Australia's most pricey urbane housing market.

PropTrack approximated Sydney's median house would cost $338,000 today, or just 4.3 times the average income now for all Australian workers, if house rates had actually increased at the exact same pace as salaries during the past 45 years (visualized is an auction at Homebush in the city's west)

Australians alerted to prepare for a big 'bill explosion'

In 1990, the common Sydney home cost $187,500 or $447,300 now if price had stayed constant.

A decade later on 2000, shortly after the introduction of the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount, a common Sydney home cost $284,950.

That would translate into $544,000 today if price had stayed continuous.

This would also be the point where a single, average-income earner might still get a loan at a stretch with a 20 percent mortgage deposit.

By 2010, Sydney's typical house expense $600,000 or nine times the average, full-time salary, putting a home with a yard beyond the reach of an average-income earner purchasing on their own.

In addition, the housing price crisis has gotten worse as Australia's population has climbed up from 14.5 million in 1980 to 27.3 million now.

During the 2000s, yearly net overseas migration doubled from 111,441 at the start of the decade to 315,700 by 2008 when the mining boom was driving population growth.

After Australia was closed during Covid, migration skyrocketed to a new record high of 548,800 in 2023, leading to house prices climbing even as the Reserve Bank was setting up interest rates.

When it concerned the stereotype of young individuals wasting their cash on smashed avocado breakfasts instead of conserving for a home deposit, Mr Eslake had a basic answer to that.

'At least, a highly noticeable rolling of the eyeballs,' he said.

SydneyBrisbaneMelbourne